Financial operations that close on time, every time.
We automate reconciliation, compliance reporting, and back-office processing for financial services firms. Faster closes, lower error rates, and audit trails that satisfy regulators.
Bank reconciliation and ledger matching
Bank feeds, general ledger entries, and transaction records are matched automatically. Exceptions surface in a review queue rather than requiring a full manual review. Month-end close times drop significantly.
KYC and AML document processing
Customer identity documents are ingested, checked against required fields, and matched against watchlists. Cases requiring human review are flagged with the specific reason. Routine completions move without analyst touch.
Regulatory compliance reporting
FICA, FATCA, CRS, and other periodic regulatory reports are assembled from source data and reviewed before submission. Deadlines are tracked automatically. Late submissions become a system alert, not a missed calendar item.
Accounts payable and receivable processing
Invoices are received, matched to purchase orders and delivery confirmations, coded to the correct cost center, and queued for approval. Payment runs execute against approved batches. Exceptions are routed with context.
Trade confirmation and settlement operations
Trade confirmations are matched against booked positions, breaks are identified and escalated, and settlement instructions are generated from confirmed trades. The manual matching step is removed from the settlement workflow.
Financial reporting and management accounts
Management accounts are assembled from sub-ledger data and delivered on a defined schedule. Commentary templates are pre-populated with actuals versus budget variances. Finance teams review rather than compile.
Process and controls audit
We map your current processes against your internal control framework. Priority targets are those with high manual volume and high error-rate risk.
Compliance architecture review
Before building anything, we review applicable regulatory requirements and design the automation to satisfy them. Audit trail design is part of this step, not an afterthought.
Phased build with parallel testing
Each automation runs in parallel with the existing process for four weeks. We do not hand over until reconciliation between the two methods matches for two consecutive weeks.
Ongoing monitoring and reporting
All financial automations have a daily exception report and a monthly quality review. Regulatory changes trigger an impact assessment within 48 hours of publication.
01 What financial regulations are you familiar with?
FICA and FATCA for South African and cross-border tax reporting, CRS (Common Reporting Standard) for automatic exchange of information, PCI DSS for payment card data environments, and Basel III/IV capital reporting for banking clients. We have also delivered automation for FSB/FSCA regulatory submissions in South Africa. We scope compliance coverage to your specific regulatory obligations during the design phase.
02 How do you handle the four-eyes control requirement for financial transactions?
We design every financial automation with configurable dual-authorization thresholds. Transactions below the threshold run end to end through the automation. Transactions at or above it route to a human approver queue with the full transaction context pre-populated. The approver's action creates a timestamped record in the audit trail. The threshold values, approver hierarchy, and escalation rules are agreed with your compliance team before go-live.
03 Can you connect to our core banking system?
We have integrated with Temenos T24 and Transact, Finastra Fusion, FIS Modern Banking Platform, and several regional core banking systems using their APIs or structured file exports. We do not modify core banking data directly. Our automation reads from the core system and updates downstream systems such as reconciliation platforms, reporting tools, and compliance databases. We confirm integration method during the technology audit.
04 What is your approach to data security for financial data?
Financial data is encrypted in transit using TLS 1.2 or higher and at rest using AES-256. Access to client financial data is role-based, logged at the field level, and auditable by date range, user, and transaction type. We support data residency requirements and do not process client financial data outside the agreed jurisdiction. Our security posture is reviewed annually.
05 How do you handle regulatory changes that affect automated processes?
We monitor regulatory publications from the relevant authorities in each jurisdiction where our clients operate, including SARB, FSCA, SEC, FCA, and others depending on the engagement. When a change affects an automated process, we issue a written impact assessment within 48 hours of the publication and a remediation plan within five business days. We do not wait for the client to find the change and report it to us.
06 Do you work with asset managers, banks, or insurers?
All three. Asset managers typically need automation for trade confirmation matching, position reconciliation, and regulatory reporting. Banks need it for KYC processing, transaction monitoring, and payment reconciliation. Insurers need it for claims processing, underwriting data collection, and compliance reporting. The underlying process pattern is similar across all three: high volume, rule-based work with exceptions routed to qualified staff for review.